|
|
Dow Chemical Dow Addresses Bhopal
Outwage, Explains Position |
|
December 3, 2002 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact:
mailto:press@dow-chemical.com
DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE,
EXPLAINS POSITION Company responds to activist concerns with
concrete action points
In response to growing public outrage
over its handling of the Bhopal disaster's legacy, Dow Chemical
(http://www.dow-chemical.com) has issued a statement explaining
why it is unable to more actively address the problem.
"We
are being portrayed as a heartless giant which doesn't care
about the 20,000 lives lost due to Bhopal over the years," said
Dow President and CEO Michael D. Parker. "But this just isn't
true. Many individuals within Dow feel tremendous sorrow about
the Bhopal disaster, and many individuals within Dow would like
the corporation to admit its responsibility, so that the public
can then decide on the best course of action, as is appropriate
in any democracy.
"Unfortunately, we have responsibilities to
our shareholders and our industry colleagues that make action on
Bhopal impossible. And being clear about this has been a very big
step."
On December 3, 1984, Union Carbide--now part of
Dow--accidentally killed 5,000 residents of Bhopal, India, when
its pesticide plant sprung a leak. It abandoned the plant without
cleaning it up, and since then, an estimated 15,000 more people
have died from complications, most resulting from chemicals
released into the groundwater.
Although legal
investigations have consistently pinpointed Union Carbide as
culprit, both Union Carbide and Dow have had to publicly deny
these findings. After the accident, Union Carbide
compensated victims' families between US$300 and US$500 per
victim.
"We understand the anger and hurt," said Dow
Spokesperson Bob Questra. "But Dow does not and cannot
acknowledge responsibility. If we did, not only would we be
required to expend many billions of dollars on cleanup and
compensation--much worse, the public could then point to Dow as a
precedent in other big cases. 'They took responsibility;
why can't you?' Amoco, BP, Shell, and Exxon all have ongoing
problems that would just get much worse. We are unable to set
this precedent for ourselves and the industry, much as we would
like to see the issue resolved in a humane and satisfying
way."
Shareholders reacted to the Dow statement with
enthusiasm. "I'm happy that Dow is being clear about its aims,"
said Panaline Boneril, who owns 10,000 shares, "because Bhopal is
a recurrent problem that's clogging our value chain and
ultimately keeping the share price from expressing its full
potential. Although a real solution is not immediately possible
because of Dow's commitments to the larger industry issues, there
is new hope in management's exceptional new clarity on the
matter."
"It's a slow process," said Questra. "We must learn
bit by bit to meet this challenge head-on. For now, this means
acknowledging that much as it pains us, our prime
responsibilities are to the people who own Dow shares, and to the
industry as a whole. We simply cannot do anything at this moment
for the people of
Bhopal."
| |