DOW
ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS
POSITION
by Anthony Lamanche
- Dow Chemical Tue, Dec 3 2002, 1:07pm
press@dow-chemical.com
Company responds to activist concerns with concrete action points
In response to growing public outrage over its handling of
the Bhopal disaster's legacy, Dow Chemical has issued a statement
explaining why it is unable to more actively address the problem.
"We are being portrayed as a heartless giant which doesn't care
about the 20,000 lives lost due to Bhopal over the years," said Dow
President and CEO Michael D. Parker. "But this
just isn't true.
Many individuals within Dow feel tremendous sorrow about the Bhopal
disaster, and many individuals within Dow would like the corporation
to admit its responsibility, so that the public can then decide on
the best course of action, as is appropriate in any democracy.
"Unfortunately, we have responsibilities to our shareholders and
our industry colleagues that make action on Bhopal impossible. And
being clear about this has been a very big step."
On December 3, 1984, Union Carbide--now part of Dow--accidentally
killed 5,000 residents of Bhopal, India, when its pesticide plant
sprung a leak. It abandoned the plant without cleaning it up, and
since then, an estimated 15,000 more people have died from
complications, most resulting from chemicals released into the
groundwater.
Although legal investigations have consistently pinpointed Union
Carbide as culprit, both Union Carbide and Dow have had to publicly
deny these findings. After the accident, Union Carbide compensated
victims' families between US$300 and US$500 per victim.
"We understand the anger and hurt," said Dow Spokesperson Bob
Questra. "But Dow does not and cannot acknowledge responsibility. If
we did, not only would we be required to expend many billions of
dollars on cleanup and compensation--much worse, the public could
then point to Dow as a precedent in other big cases. 'They took
responsibility; why can't you?' Amoco, BP, Shell, and Exxon all
have ongoing problems that would just get much worse. We are unable
to set this precedent for ourselves and the industry, much as we
would like to see the issue resolved in a humane and satisfying
way."
Shareholders reacted to the Dow statement with enthusiasm. "I'm
happy that Dow is being clear about its aims," said Panaline
Boneril, who owns 10,000 shares, "because Bhopal is a recurrent
problem that's clogging our value chain and ultimately keeping the
share price from expressing its full potential. Although a real
solution is not immediately possible because of Dow's commitments to
the larger industry issues, there is new hope in management's
exceptional new clarity on the matter." "It's a slow process," said
Questra. "We must learn bit by bit to meet this challenge head-on.
For now, this means
acknowledging that much as it pains us, our
prime responsibilities are to the people who own Dow shares, and to
the industry as a whole. We simply cannot do anything at this moment
for the people of Bhopal."
Dow Chemical is a chemical products and services company devoted
to bringing its customers a wide range of chemicals. It furnishes
solutions for the agriculture, electronics, manufacturing, and oil
and gas industries, including well-known products like Styrofoam,
DDT, and Agent Orange, as well as lesser-known brands like Inspire,
Retain, Eliminator, Quash, and Woodstalk. For more on the Bhopal
catastrophe, please visit Dow at http://www.dow-chemical.com/
Contact:press@dow-chemical.com
related link: www.dow-chemical.com/
add
your comments
COMMENTS
how capitalists express sorrow for 20,000
dead.....
by pete ranks Tue,
Dec 3 2002, 1:43pm
it affects their profits->
"because Bhopal is a
recurrent problem that's
clogging our value chain and ultimately
keeping the share price from
expressing its full
potential."
said a shareholder with regard to the Bhopal
'problem', she ain't getting value for money for her shares, boo
hoo. Perhaps if 20000 shareholders died of poisoning it might
provoke some human feeling?
FORGERY?
by William
Tue, Dec 3 2002, 3:06pm
This may not be from DOW Chemical. A copy of the email
header from the release contains a different sender address. Look:
X-Auth-No:
Return-Path: (*??who???*)
Received: from
echo.kirenet.com not authenticated [208.27.69.10]
by
smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.19 $
on
Novell NetWare;
Tue, 03 Dec 2002 02:31:16
-0700
Received: (from mikeb@localhost)
by echo.kirenet.com
(8.9.3/69.69.69) id CAA26418;
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 02:43:04
-0500
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 02:43:04 -0500
Message-Id:
To:
"thomasleavitt-myrealbox.com"
From: Dow Chemical Corporation
Subject: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS
POSITION
Sender: dow41-proxypress@dow-chemical.com
FORGERY?
by William
Tue, Dec 3 2002, 3:06pm
This may not be from DOW Chemical. A copy of the email
header from the release contains a different sender address. Look:
X-Auth-No:
Return-Path: mikeb@echo.kirenet.com
(*??who???*)
Received: from echo.kirenet.com not authenticated
[208.27.69.10]
by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent
$Revision: 3.19 $ on
Novell NetWare;
Tue, 03 Dec 2002 02:31:16
-0700
Received: (from mikeb@localhost)
by echo.kirenet.com
(8.9.3/69.69.69) id CAA26418;
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 02:43:04
-0500
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 02:43:04 -0500
Message-Id:
To:
"thomasleavitt-myrealbox.com"
From: Dow Chemical Corporation
Subject: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS
POSITION
Sender: dow41-proxypress@dow-chemical.com
Well Done SEHB ...... ooeerrrr William
by John Joe Tue, Dec 3 2002,
5:08pm
Who's a bright boy, then? Check out "sarcasm" in the
dictionary and you might get the point. The purpose of this article
is to show what Dow _would_ be saying if they told the truth. Fat
chance, but someone had the good idea of making it up. Not bad, eh?
add
your comments
<<
back to newswire