Posted on 3/23/02 6:57 PM Pacific by teresat

1 posted on 3/23/02 6:57 PM Pacific by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

The Left is, by definition, sinister. --S. Beast

2 posted on 3/23/02 7:15 PM Pacific by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Sinister and conspiring to commit illegal acts. Where's J. Ashcroft, this needs to be investigated.

3 posted on 3/23/02 7:20 PM Pacific by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Sinister means left in Latin and in English. We should use this quite meaningful word more often, don't you agree?

4 posted on 3/23/02 7:29 PM Pacific by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Wh@ck a pundit! Return to fund

Wh@ck a pundit!

delilah <faelanae@hotmail.com>, 2002/02/23
Forum: Funds

Sabotage the Wh@ck-a-mole carnival game and replace or paint over the mole faces with the faces of assorted pundits, politicians, and big business CEOs (Ann Coulter, G.W. Bush, John Ashcroft, Warren Buffett, etc.). Alternately, develop and online game similar to this gopher game and redesign the faces.

a better idea! by Dawgsquat, 2002/03/23, 22:22 Wh@ck a pundit! a better idea! Return to fund a better idea! Dawgsquat, 2002/03/23 Forum: Funds Re: http://www.rtmark.com/f/get/funds/161.html?inline=-1 (delilah) Make them look like gerbils with Hillary's face on them and shove them up your ***! a better idea!

5 posted on 3/23/02 7:30 PM Pacific by Dawgsquat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Sorry, I must be showing the effects of a public education.

6 posted on 3/23/02 8:31 PM Pacific by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

LOL!

7 posted on 3/23/02 8:38 PM Pacific by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Ann Coulter alert see post#5

8 posted on 3/23/02 8:43 PM Pacific by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

I noticed one poster referred to Freespeech and would assume that's the same as Free Speech TV, which is a communist station seen on Dish TV. Interesting...

I would say these Marxist delinquents are excellent candidates to stand in place for the (now absent) Johnny Jihad Lynd over in Afghanistan! Shall we take up a collection to send them?

9 posted on 3/23/02 11:58 PM Pacific by Humidston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

No, you just didn't have Mrs. McAlpin for Latin. She scared it into me.

10 posted on 3/24/02 1:22 AM Pacific by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Childish crap ! Just think : in a few years, some of these participants will be America's leaders !

11 posted on 3/25/02 8:09 AM Pacific by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

You people sure scare easily. "Far left"? "Communist"? Haven't heard this kind of freak-out since McCarthy. Get a grip.

12 posted on 3/25/02 8:21 AM Pacific by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

The only thing Americans need to fear, TT, is decadence, and that is what contempory Liberalism represents. And I am afraid of that. We should all should be. As far as Communism goes--it has already failed. If America remains healthy and free of decadence, our enemies from without cannot harm us. The Left--Liberalism--is by definition sinister, and it represents decadence. I'm not afraid of Communists. I am afraid of moral decay from within--decadence. You shouldn't jump to shallow conclusions like that; you can do better.

13 posted on 3/25/02 8:42 AM Pacific by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

"Moral decay from within"? Haven't heard that sort of thing since Cicero against Catiline!

14 posted on 3/25/02 9:41 AM Pacific by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Yep. That's it. So you were paying attention in Latin class. I knew you knew more than you were letting on, you rascal.

15 posted on 3/25/02 12:24 PM Pacific by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Well then, Cicero: watch your hands; the empire is just beginning.

16 posted on 3/25/02 11:48 PM Pacific by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

That's what I'm afraid of! And you said that we people were freaking out and should get a grip!

Imperial Rome is one of mankind's most dubious achievements. Discovering that we have reincarnated into it is something to freak out about!

McCarthy my Aunt Livia!

17 posted on 3/26/02 12:17 AM Pacific by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

All salute Emperor Bush. Was Octavian a dimwit as well? I don't remember that lesson.

18 posted on 3/27/02 3:59 AM Pacific by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

I think I dozed off when she was talking about Octavian.

Wasn't he the same person as Augustus? If so, he was completely done in by his wife, who finally finished him off with a bunch of poisoned figs. I guess he was a dimwit, but maybe she was just very smart.

But if and when we loose our republic, I don't think it's going to matter much whether we have a dimwit, a genius, or the noblest of them all in power; Caligula and Nero will emerge soon enough. I think we have already had a glimpse of them on the national scene.

I do not think we're about to loose the republic. But the erosion of liberty that has occurred all ready is plenty to be concerned about.

What do you think about all this? I would be interested in knowing your opinion. Have you been reading and posting at Free Republic for a long time? --SB

19 posted on 3/27/02 6:26 AM Pacific by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

>Wasn't he the same person as Augustus?

Yep.

>But if and when we loose our republic, I don't think it's going to matter much whether we have a dimwit, a genius, or the noblest of them all in power

I think you're right--Bush at least is just a character filling the role assigned to him.

>But the erosion of liberty that has occurred all ready is plenty to be concerned about.

Yes--the way they use September 11 is really frightening.

>Have you been reading and posting at Free Republic for a long time?

No, just a few days.

20 posted on 3/29/02 4:13 AM Pacific by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

“the way they use September 11 is really frightening. ”

Yes.

21 posted on 3/29/02 5:24 AM Pacific by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

So what I'm a little confused about is: if we're talking about the same thing, then we agree that the current administration is rushing us headlong into empire or worse. So why are you railing against "liberals," who are not even being kept apprised of the administration's plans for saving the executive in case of catastrophic war? Why, when thousands of aliens have been disappeared by those in power, do you think that RTMark and that sort represent danger?

22 posted on 3/29/02 11:30 PM Pacific by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

p.s. By "aliens" of course I meant the human, illegal sort. I forgot this is the internet, anything's possible....

23 posted on 3/31/02 7:16 PM Pacific by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

[ Latest Posts | Search | Topics | Post | Members | Self-Search | Settings | Help! ]