Three Hybrids and the BIG SOCIAL ERROR An offline experience of the Biennial of Young Artists of Turin by Snafu - 05/10/2002 [art] |
||
Take three hybrids and put them in the same test tube. Take a volatile catalyst and mix continuously. At best, you will get a new mutant, at a worst, a BIG mistake. This is the story of a BIG mistake. At first glance, the three hybrids are recognizable by their organizational ambivalence. The first one is an activist group which pretends to be a headhunting company; the second is a bunch of troublemakers who present themselves as a subversive corporation; the third is an artist collective that plays with corporate aesthetics and grammar. The shaker, or the bartender, is BIG Torino (http://www.bigguest.net), the third Biennial of Young Artists currently on view in the regional capital of Piemonte (expiration date: May 19th). The reacting agent is the organizers' concern that the three hybrids' actions, and their rather ambiguous way of communicating, could irritate the Italian Government, and that the festival, directed by Michelangelo Pistoletto, could consequently lose the institutional support of the Italian Minister of Culture. Thus, the original BIG concept was quite inspiring. Working under the assumption that the Internet is changing the way in which people communicate, the Festival was inviting many national and international artists to play a BIG SOCIAL GAME within the urban space of Turin. In other words, the call was to transfer the Internet game to the public "hardwired" arena in order to stimulate new ways of interacting and transforming the urban space. |
etoy cordoned | |
The first group is No One Is Illegal, a Germany-based activist network, founded in 1997 during Documenta X in Kassel. In Turin, No One Is Illegal presents itself as Everyone is an Expert. The group presented Expertbase, a database accessible via a web interface (http://www.expertbase.net), that allows users to post their CVs and presentations. As the group explains: "the Expertbase is targeted directly against the discrimination immigrants are facing in Europe in the fields of labor-, residential- and social-status." The critique of the new Italian law on immigration -- which strictly relates the release of a visa to a job position -- remained indirect until the group decided to make it explicit. A few days before the beginning of the Festival (April 19th) Everyone is an Expert added a slogan on the website and in the paper they planned to distribute from an old newsstand: "Basta con Berlusconi, bossi, fini - benvenuti clandestini". On April 20th, the BIG directory board -- composed of Michelangelo Pistoletto, Luigi Ratclif, Giancinto di Pietrantonio, t.Omi Schneiderbauer and Teresa Alonso Novo -- invited the group for a talk. The directors asked Everyone is an Expert to retract the slogan, "as it would constitute an undesired provocation towards the Italian government." Moreover, the directors asserted that the slogan would be artistically uninteresting, as it would cancel the "subtle and constructive" critique contained in the Expertbase. After consulting with the rest of the organization, the three German artists who represent EIAE -- Wolfgang Hauptfleisch, Frank John, and Paul Keller -- refused to withdraw the slogan, insisting on its full coherence with the rest of the project. Given the impossibility of a compromise, on April 22nd the group announced its intention to quit the Festival. However, the conference where the debate took place became the theater of a surprisingly heated discussion between two other groups: RTMark and Etoy. RTMark is taking part in BIG with an installation called Blockbastard or Blockbusconi (http://www.rtmark.com/torino). It was originally part of a wider project, in collaboration with Barcelona-based collective Las Agencias (http://www.lasagencias.net). The two groups were supposed to share a Showbus, a vehicle fully equipped with video-recording facilities. The bus would have stopped in front of the thirteen Blockbuster stores in Turin, inviting Blockbuster customers to join in. Once on the bus, the customer could have recorded a personal message over the video previews section of the tape - by wearing a mask of Berlusconi or of any other politician. Then they would have returned the tape to the Blockbuster. Since Las Agencias was kicked out by the Festival a few weeks before its beginning, RTMark could realize its project only by moving the recording equipment into a bar. By not benefiting from any proximity to the retailers, the project lost most of its impact. But there's more: once in Turin, RTMark was required by the organizers to sign a letter of responsibility for any possible defamatory message. The corporation did not sign the letter, deciding instead to push down on the accelerator. For the third act of this complex game, see the unwilling involvement of Austria-based group, etoy. For BIG, etoy has created an ambitious installation called etoy.DAY-CARE, made of two big orange containers placed right in the middle of the main square of Turin, Piazza Castello. The project is born from the visionary idea of a training for future generations, to be realized with elementary school students. |
| |
Thus, in the night between April the 20th and the 21st, the two containers were surrounded by caution tape from which some banners allegedly hung by the City of Turin warn: "Access Denied / Keep Out / For Filming "Forza Italia" TV Spot by RAI and Mediaset". The banners remained up for all of Sunday and were removed only on Monday, when the time for the supposed "shooting" was over. The passersby also stopped and read with some curiosity, if not concern, a disclaimer which stated that the Italian Prime Minister's party had seized an art installation to produce some TV propaganda. The spot relied also on an Orwellian co-production by RAI (the public TV, controlled by the Government) and the PM's personal TV empire (Mediaset). Furthermore, the number of the City ordinance (1816) is, by coincidence perhaps, the same one as on the Berlusconi P2 membership card (P2 was a political conspiracy to overthrow democracy in Italy). But if the operation is a trick, who played it? |
Access Denied | |
The mystery was unveiled on Monday evening, when Everyone is an Expert announced its retirement. RTMark claimed to have sponsored the cordoning-off and the conceptual "detournement" of etoy.DAY-CARE to test "the people's reaction to the Berlusconian invasion of an independent artistic space." The group noticed how no one reacted to their censorship and how dangerous this conformist climate could become in a country where information is completely owned or controlled by the Prime Minister. For its part, etoy reacted with anger, not seeing the point of becoming the victim of such an operation. Etoy basically said, "we don't want to be associated with Forza Italia," and "we don't understand why RTMark played such a dirty trick with our work," which aims to produce social change through different channels. RTMark replied that the target of their operation was the passerby and not the artists themselves. Thus, besides the friction between the groups who animated the Toywar back in 1999, BIG Torino is an interesting lesson in how Italian institutions perceive hybrid discourses which are born out of the Net. While in the Netherlands, in Germany, and to a certain extent in England, art has become increasingly a platform for public speaking, in Italy -- a country where activist networks are stronger -- a politicization of art looks almost impossible. It was sufficient that Alleanza Nazionale raised a loud voice against the Festival to activate the Foucaltian machine of self-censorship. When the BIG SOCIAL GAME turned into a political game, featuring real names and real conflicts, everything jumped. By obeying the heavy pressures of the political body, the Festival's direction was forced to retreat to more secure territory, and risked confining art to a pure function of urban decoration. So, while the Internet continues to be the laboratory which gives birth and feeds the new mutants, the urban space becomes sterilized, in order not to be infected by consuming bacteria. It is as if the game of simulation and linguistic contamination has to remain only as a pure metaphor. |
| |
|
|