FCW
HomeFCWCivicFCW EventsLink DirectoryMY FCW.COMGBUYSCompany Info
sapcer ManagementTechnologyPolicyCurrent IssueReviews & TestingNews FCW
spacer spacer
SEARCH

Accessibility
Agencies
Agenda
Defense
Democracy
Education
E-Government
Industry
New Products
Procurement
Technology
Telecom
Wireless
Work Force
MICROSITES
Security
Records Management
Seat Management
TOP HEADLINES

DOD awards deal to secure medical data

Agencies model GPEA report

NASA picks financial system backbone

SIGN UP TODAY
Free Subscriptions to Federal Computer Week and Civic.com
E-Mail Newsletters
MEDIA CENTER
MediaZone
Contact Us





FCW

Is a vote-selling Web site parody or threat?

Web site’s auction premise brings reprisals


Wicked political satire, or just wicked? A Web site, Vote-auction.com, is generating grins and chagrin with its brazen offer to buy and sell votes via the Internet.

"Sell your vote online," the site urges. "Voteauction.com is devoted to combining the American principles of democracy and capitalism by bringing the big money of campaigns directly to the voting public."

The site promises candidates "a greater return on your campaign investment" by buying votes outright rather than paying millions of dollars to consultants and advertisers to influence voters.

To voters, Voteauction says, "profit from your election capital by selling your vote to the highest bidder."

The month-old Web site has been praised as pointed parody and condemned as a detriment to democracy.

Created by James Baumgartner, a 26-year-old graduate student at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., the site has generated hundreds of responses from voters as well as a prompt cease-and-desist order from the New York Board of Elections.

Amid warnings that buying and selling votes is a felony, Baumgartner sold the site to an Austrian businessman, who has said he plans to operate the site through the November presidential election to judge its potential for profit.

The idea that the Internet could turn votes into a marketable commodity troubles many. About a week after Vote-auction went online, California Secretary of State Bill Jones threatened to prosecute "any individual who attempts to buy or sell votes, whether through an Internet auction site or personal communication."

California election fraud investigators "will be monitoring Web sites for suspicious election activity," Jones said.

"There is no question in my mind that this could be used to influence the outcome of elections," said Deborah Phillips, president of The Voting Integrity Project, a voter rights organization. "It’s cynical."

Others see only keen satire. "It’s a joke," insisted Ari Schwartz, a policy analyst at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a research organization that promotes improving democracy via information technology.

New York election officials were less certain. "It’s hard to place in my mind if it’s over-the-line political satire, or if there is money being transacted," said Lee Daghlian, public information director for the New York Board of Elections.

Ultimately, state election officials warned Baumgartner that selling and buying votes "is thoroughly illegal," Daghlian said. However, the state took no action against Baumgartner after he posted "Not Valid in New York" on the site. "As far as we’re concerned, since it says that, it doesn’t apply in New York, — it’s out of our hands," Daghlian said.

Justice Department spokeswoman Chris Watney said at least two federal laws make it illegal to buy or sell votes or to aid and abet in the buying or selling of votes. She declined to say whether any action would be taken against Voteauction.

It may be too late, according to Phillips. "Now that it’s moved offshore, the question is whether even those authorities who could pursue it — the Justice Department and the FBI — would be able to do so."http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2000/0904/cov-vote-09-04-00.asp "Can the Net revive the vote" [Federal Computer Week, Sept. 4, 2000]

http://www.fcw.com/civic/articles/2000/0911/web-evote-09-14-00.asp "Fraud casts pall over Internet voting" [civic.com, Sept. 14, 2000]



spacer spacer