|
|
|
Auction
Gives New Meaning To 'Check Here'
|
Wednesday, August 30,
2000 |
|
BY DAN
HARRIE THE SALT LAKE
TRIBUNE
Challenging the
notion that the right to vote is priceless, a new Internet
site has sprung up to exchange money for votes.
Voteauction.com allows voters to
register their votes for sale to the highest bidder --
presumably politicians or special interests looking for the
best bang for their campaign-contribution buck. Votes are
grouped by state to be sold in blocs for the presidential
election. The Web site carries the
slogan: "Bringing capitalism and democracy closer together."
Created by 26-year-old graduate student
James Baumgartner of New York, the site was shut down
temporarily last week amid a flurry of news stories about
Department of Justice scrutiny of the scheme, along with
similar attempted auctions on eBay. But voteauction.com
already has reopened under Austrian ownership.
Asked if the scheme is a lampoon of the current campaign
finance system, Baumgartner told The Salt Lake Tribune his
site is "very serious." But he allowed that his purpose is a
combination of commentary and profit.
Putting votes on the auction block is "the next logical
extension" of money-driven elections, he said, adding voters
should have the opportunity to be "profiting from an emerging
industry -- the American election industry."
"It puts the power back in the voters'
hands," Baumgartner said. He even suggested that a financial
incentive would motivate apathetic Americans used to sitting
out elections to participate in the democratic process.
Utahns don't appear much interested in
selling their democratic franchise -- at least not so far.
As of Tuesday, only two residents
(whose identities were withheld) had put their votes up for
bid, and no offers had been submitted. That compared with 39
California votes registered for sale and 18 from Texas. The
best price offered was $100 for a single Illinois vote.
"I'm hoping, with hyperbole, he is
making fun of" the role of money in politics, said retired
University of Utah political scientist J.D. Williams. "In that
case, I applaud the ruse or whatever it is. . . . Probably the
central evil in the American political system is money."
But if Baumgartner is serious about
trying to tap into a new money-making scheme, "then I'm
ashamed," said Williams, denouncing the concept as bribery. He
said it begs the question of what a vote is worth.
Based on campaign spending history,
Utah politicians over the years have had widely different
opinions on the subject. The highest
price ever paid in a major race probably was the $47 per vote
laid out by steel magnate Joe Cannon in his 1992 U.S. Senate
race. Cannon invested $6 million in
personal funds only to finish second in the Republican primary
with 128,125 votes. Enid Greene in her
famously expensive -- and illegally financed -- 1994 House
campaign spent about $22 per vote. Merrill Cook paid an even
higher premium that year, about $26 per vote, to finish in
third place. Of course, the money did
not go to voters but to glitzy television ads, high-priced
consultants and even hot-air balloons.
Voteauction.com argues that cash should go directly to voters.
Utahn Janet Jenson agrees.
"This is a cynical thing but it is
really kind of realistic," said Jenson, who used to make her
living as a Washington lobbyist and, later, a Capitol Hill
staffer. "You'd have to be naive to believe that most members
of Congress are not for sale." "It's
very clever," said Jenson, "because it just avoids the
middleman."
|
| |
© Copyright 2000, The Salt Lake
Tribune All material found on Utah OnLine is copyrighted The
Salt Lake Tribune and associated news services. No material
may be reproduced or reused without explicit permission from
The Salt Lake Tribune.
| |
|