See also:
Close Vote? You Can Bid On ItReform Voting Evokes E-VotesParties Dancing With the NetEverybody's got
issues in
PoliticsVote 2000: Life after Bill (Lycos News)
Last week, Voteauction received a spate of publicity that began
with a Wired
News story. Two days of intense press and Internet attention
followed, which concluded in legal threats that compelled its
operator to shut it down.
"I acted immediately when I found out about [Voteauction]," said
Doug Kellner, one of two Manhattan representatives on the New York
City Board of Elections.
Kellner said selling votes is not only illegal within New York
state law, but the state constitution also bars it. The only other
crime the constitution defines, he said, is treason.
Before last week, Voteauction had received emails from five
voters indicating their interest in selling their votes. When it
shut down on Aug. 18, Baumgartner said, an estimated 200 had
expressed their initial interest in participating. Although no
contracts had been signed -- legal language was still being worked
out when the site was shut down -- the interests of potential
participants ranged from the pecuniary to the polemic.
"Some were doing it as a joke, some were serious, some were
cynical, some were sincere," Baumgartner said. "Somebody else said
they were going to buy voterauction.com."
When visited on Monday afternoon, Voterauction.com -- with the
extra "r" -- appeared to be a mirror of the George W. Bush campaign website. Although
given the history of web-based satire inspired by the Texas
governor's presidential bid, one can never be sure.
Kellner stressed the seriousness of the criminal consequences for
those who even indicate their interest in buying or selling a vote.
"The message to get out to the public is that posting (intent to
sell votes) to a website even in jest is a serious matter. It could
subject you to prosecution, or in New York you could forfeit your
vote," Kellner said, referring to a New York state law that imposes
a one-year forfeiture on vote buyers and sellers.
Baumgartner, who continues to stress that his site holds a mirror
up to a larger corrupt electoral system, offered no comment in
response to Kellner's charges.
1 of 2 Next >>
Have a comment on this article? Send it.
Printing? Use this version.
Email this to a friend.
Feedback | Help
| About Us | Jobs
| Advertise
Editorial
Policy | Privacy Statement | Terms
and Conditions
Copyright © 2000 Wired Digital Inc., a Lycos Network
site. All rights reserved.