Heath
Bunting
is
on
a
mission.
But
don't
asking
him
to
define
what
it
is.
His
CV
(bored
teen
and
home
computer
hacker
in
80s
Stevenage,
flyposter,
graffiti
artist
and
art
radio
pirate
in
Bristol,
bulletin
board
organiser
and
digital
culture
activist
(or,
his
phrase,
artivist)
in
London
(is
replete
with
the
necessary
qualifications
for
a
90s
sub-culture
citizen
but
what
s
interesting
about
Heath
is
that
if
you
want
to
describe
to
someone
what
he
actually
does
there
s
simply
no
handy
category
that
you
can
slot
him
into.
If
you
had
to
classify
him,
you
could
do
worse
than
call
him
an
organiser
of
art
events.
Some
of
these
take
place
online,
some
of
them
in
RL,
most
of
them
have
something
to
do
with
technology,
though
not
all.
One
early
event
that
hit
the
headlines
was
his
1994
Kings
Cross
phone-in,
when
Heath
distributed
the
numbers
of
the
telephone
kiosks
around
Kings
Cross
station
using
the
Internet
and
asked
whoever
found
them
to
choose
one,
call
it
at
a
specific
time
and
chat
with
whoever
picked
up
the
phone.
The
incident
was
a
resounding
success;
at
6
pm
one
August
afternoon,
the
are
was
transformed
into
"a
massive
techno
crowd
dancing
to
the
sound
of
ringing
telephones",
according
to
Heath.
More
recently,
in
collaboration
with
his
mother
an
ex-Greenham
activist
and
bus
driver
he
set
up
a
bogus
Glaxo
website
which
mimicked
the
real
one
and
asked
employees
to
send
in
their
pets
for
vivisection
and
experimentation.
Glaxo
were
alarmed
enough
to
issue
a
public
statement,
and
have
the
offending
site
removed.
But
why
has
this
one-time
graffiti
artist
and
stained
glass
window
apprentice
embraced
the
net?
When
I
was
on
the
street
I
was
always
looking
for
new
tools,
and
I
was
always
looking
to
do
battle
with
the
front-end
though
I
hesitate
to
say
the
front
end
of
what,
exactly.
For
me
the
real
excitement
of
the
net
was
that
it
exposed
many
different
types
of
people.
Also,
the
new
medium
gave
someone
like
Heath
who
had
little
or
no
resources
-
the
chance
to
engage
head
on
with
large-scale
organisations.
I've
always
attacked
big
things.
When
I
was
a
kid
I
always
used
to
pick
fights
with
people
that
were
bigger
than
me.
I
suppose
I've
carried
on
doing
it,
though
now
I"m
fighting
multinationals,
or
large
belief
systems.
I
grew
up
in
Stevenage,
too,
which
although
it
seems
very
pleasant
jobs,
grass,
good
transport
it
is
in
fact
an
incredibly
violent
place.
It
s
to
do
with
the
top-down
plan
of
the
whole
place
and
all
the
areas
are
designated,
for
example.
I
think
that
s
where
I
got
my
hatred
of
large
forms.
People
think
it's
a
shame
that
there's
no
central
body
in
London.
I
think
that's
great.
This
year
is
the
one
in
which
Heath
has
really
begun
to
get
recognition
by
the
burgeoning
European
digital
arts
scene
that
conference
hops
its
way
around
the
continent
from
one
year's
end
to
the
next.
This
is
the
year,
he
says,
that
net
art
is
going
to
be
absorbed
into
electronic
art
in
a
big
way.
But
although
his
travel
schedule
is
beginning
to
look
completely
insane.
Heath
has
been
doing
a
bit
of
conference
organising
of
his
own.
Last
year,
pissed
off
with
gatherings
like
Digital
Dreams,
which
cost
thousands
of
pounds
to
stage
and
gave
no
one
access
to
any
of
the
big
names
he
put
together
the
Netmare
conference
(TK),
were
there
was
no
distinction
between
audience
and
speaker;
at
the
moment,
he
is
organising
a
series
of
informal
lecture
meetings
called
Anti
with
E
at
the
Backspace
cyberlounge
in
Winchester
Wharf.
Already,
though,
Heath
sees
the
possibilities
for
staging
really
challenging
events
on
the
net
decreasing.
All
those
things
which
the
Net
initially
exposed
are
now
being
covered
over.
The
real
form
of
control
is
not
police
confiscating
servers
but
financial
dictates.
The
potential
for
different
possibilities
is
being
diminished
by
money.
For
example,
a
lot
of
people
who
used
to
do
challenging
work
are
business
people
in
their
own
right
now
and
this
is
effectively
a
form
of
self-censorship.
Also,
and
this
is
only
a
suspicion,
but
a
strong
one,
search
engines
are
beginning
to
deliberately
ignore
certain
kinds
of
content.
The
sites
of
jodi.org,
to
take
one
case,
were
refused
by
Yahoo
because
they
were
meaningless
by
Yahoos
standards.
With
this
in
mind,
Heath
is
dreaming
up
ways
to
sabotage
other
technologies
like
CCTV
and
marketing
databases.
But
he
is
not
going
to
go
around
smashing
cameras
that's
not
his
style:
by
smashing
cameras
you
only
reinforced
the
system.
You
need
to
get
people
to
begin
to
doubt
the
system.
That's
what
I
do
-
I
create
disbelief.
The
idea
is
to
introduce
bad
data
into
such
systems
using
techniques
of
illusion,
so
that
they
cease
to
become
trustworthy
-
optical
illusions
for
cameras,
inconsistencies
and
false
identities
for
the
databases.
Will
it
work?
Judge
for
yourself:
Heath
is
demonstating
his
new
techniques
in
Lancaster
in
June;
for
details,
see
his
website
http://www.irational.org