August 14, 1999
Look-Alike Web Site Mocks Giuliani's Senate Ambitions
 Mayoral Aides Can't Unplug Parody Pages
By  ADAM NAGOURNEY
 
    
 
t first click, it appears to be the 
official Web site of Rudolph W. Giuliani's Senate campaign.
 The home page is headlined, 
"Rudy Giuliani: U.S. Senate," and it 
opens with spray of photographs of 
the Mayor, grinning and posing with 
children.   
There is a sunny greeting 
from  Giuliani, ending with a 
scribble of a signature. There is even 
a spot to pledge donations to 
Giuliani's presumed campaign 
against Hillary Rodham Clinton.
 Indeed, it takes a few moments 
before it becomes clear that 
www.yesrudy.com is, in fact,  the latest -- and some experts said Friday, one of the most sophisticated -- 
example of an Internet attack on an 
established political candidate. Unlike Giuliani's real Web site, 
 which is called rudyyes.com, this one 
is the product of RTMark, a group of 
advocates  who specialize in anticorporate pranks, and whose earlier 
Web hazing of Gov. George W. Bush 
so enraged Bush that his staff 
went to court and the Federal Elections Commission to try, so far unsuccessfully, to shut it down.
 At a time when political campaigns across the nation are exploring new ways to turn the Internet to 
their political advantage -- both Mrs. 
Clinton and Giuliani had their 
Web sites up virtually before they 
had rented office space -- this latest 
incident  suggests that this  technology may have as many hazards as 
advantages for the world of politics. 
The anti-Giuliani Web site is a repository of criticisms and  newspaper 
stories, created to remind readers  of 
episodes  in  the Mayor's public life 
that he might otherwise not spotlight.
 In appearance and language, the 
anti-Giuliani site is, at least initially, 
a near mirror image of the pro-Giuliani site. There are direct links 
from the anti-Giuliani site to 
Giuliani's official Web site, as well as 
to the anti-Clinton Web site Giuliani's organization has maintained.
  The net product was described by 
Republicans and Democrats yesterday as particularly subversive, capable of confusing even the most observant browser.
 For all the similarities, though --
the creators of the Web site said they 
literally lifted language and photographs from Giuliani's site -- it 
is entirely legal, in the view of election officials. And there is apparently 
nothing Giuliani can do about it.
 "We've looked into it," said Bruce 
J. Teitelbaum,  the director of 
Giuliani's political committee. "We 
spoke to lawyers who specialize in 
this kind of work. They said there is 
absolutely no resource we have."
 One clear sign of the subtlety of the 
Web attack came when Howard 
Wolfson, the spokesman for Mrs. 
Clinton's campaign, was asked if the 
Clinton campaign had any involvement with the new anti-Giuliani Web 
site. "What do you mean?"  Wolfson inquired, as he clicked to the site. 
"This is his Web site."
  After a moment of silence,  
Wolfson broke out laughing. "Wow," 
he said. He said the First Lady's 
exploratory committee had no  involvement in the Web site.
     Giuliani's greeting on the 
 home page appears identical to the 
one on the official Giuliani site -- 
until the remarks suddenly veer into 
the boast that  New York "increasingly focuses the world's wealth in a 
few million white hands."
  From there,  the bogus Web site 
praises the human rights record of 
Jean-Claude (Baby Doc) Duvalier, 
the deposed President of Haiti, with 
links noting that Mr. Giuliani, when 
serving as the No. 3 official in the 
Federal Justice Department, argued 
that there were no human rights 
abuses in Haiti.   
 On the official site, 
  Giuliani offers this slogan under 
his signature:  "Proven Leadership 
for the Future." On the  parody site, 
that has been changed to "Extreme 
Leadership for the Future."
 Precisely because of the threat of 
these kinds of occurrences, campaigns are now beginning to try to 
register every conceivable permutation of their candidate's name. 
Giuliani's exploratory campaign 
had, in fact, reserved the site
yesrudy.com among others. But, 
Teitelbaum said, the campaign decided not to pay the cost of holding all 
the names. It costs about $70 to register a Web site name.
 It is debatable whether such attacks will change the minds of many 
 voters. "They are irritants," said 
Benjamin Ginsberg, who is general 
counsel to Bush's campaign, and 
has been involved in the effort to 
close  a similar attack on the Texas 
Governor. "I think at this stage, they 
are not swaying any votes."
 Ray Thomas, a spokesman for 
RTMark, the  loosely knit organization that posted the site, contended 
that the information   might influence 
undecided voters who had strayed 
onto what they thought was the official Giuliani page.   
"Then there are 
the pro-Giuliani people that we just 
want to upset," he said.
 Michael Cornfield, a professor at 
George Washington University who 
is studying the Internet and campaigns this year, described this incident of Giuliani Web-hazing as particularly effective. He said, though, 
that Mr. Giuliani would be ill advised 
to try to fight it.
 "This is in the tradition of Mad 
magazine and Mark Russell and Pat 
Paulsen," he said. "Americans love 
to lampoon the rich and powerful."
Related Sites
These sites are not part of The New York Times on the Web, and The Times has no control over their content or availability.