If one examines postdialectic theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept capitalist semanticism or conclude that concensus comes from the collective unconscious, but only if the premise of subtextual libertarianism is valid; otherwise, class, surprisingly, has objective value. But Bataille uses the term 'textual nihilism' to denote the role of the observer as artist. Debord suggests the use of capitalist capitalism to deconstruct sexism.
"Society is elitist," says Lacan. In a sense, the cultural paradigm of reality suggests that consciousness is capable of significant form. La Fournier[1] implies that we have to choose between capitalist capitalism and capitalist sublimation.
In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the distinction between opening and closing. Therefore, Baudrillard uses the term 'capitalist semanticism' to denote not discourse, as textual nihilism suggests, but subdiscourse. Lacan promotes the use of capitalist capitalism to modify sexuality.
If one examines textual nihilism, one is faced with a choice: either reject capitalist semanticism or conclude that society has significance. However, if capitalist capitalism holds, we have to choose between capitalist semanticism and Derridaist reading. The subject is contextualised into a capitalist capitalism that includes narrativity as a totality.
Therefore, Lyotard suggests the use of predialectic appropriation to challenge capitalism. Lacan's essay on textual nihilism states that consciousness serves to exploit the Other, given that art is distinct from reality.
However, the rubicon, and some would say the meaninglessness, of semioticist neodialectic theory intrinsic to Gibson's Virtual Light emerges again in Idoru, although in a more self-referential sense. The subject is interpolated into a capitalist capitalism that includes art as a reality.
It could be said that the characteristic theme of Humphrey's[2] model of capitalist semanticism is the role of the participant as reader. In Port of Saints, Burroughs affirms textual nihilism; in Queer, however, he analyses capitalist capitalism.
Thus, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the common ground between class and society. Lyotard promotes the use of semantic narrative to read and analyse reality.
But Drucker[3] suggests that we have to choose between capitalist semanticism and subcapitalist objectivism. Sontag suggests the use of capitalist capitalism to deconstruct sexism.
The essay you have probably just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak and modified slightly by Pope Dubious Provenance XI using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: "On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks". An on-line copy is available here.
More generated texts are linked to from the Communications From Elsewhere front page.