The 21st century's greatest crime is a corporate one
Subscribe to mailing listContact RTMarkHome
Current projectsBack to Past projectsPromotional materialsBeyond us 
The meanness of Dow and Verio
The Yes Men impersonate the WTO
Voteauction.com
CueJack
The etoy Fund
Back to The Presidential Exploratory Committee
Le comité présidentiel exploratoire
Back to The content of GWBush.com
Back to Research Initiatives
Question Block 1 (Competition)
Question Block 2 (The Human People) (open)
Question Block 3 (Illegal Drug Use)
Corporate crime
Just say 'no' to deception
Bush on the scourge of advertising
Why elect?
Links of interest
GWBush.com 1 (makes new window)
GWBush.com 2 (makes new window)
'Limits to freedom' release
Initial GWBush.com release
GWBush.com press
Letters from GWBush.com readers
Bush's cease-and-desist letter
Bush's letter to the F.E.C.
Reamweaver
The World Trade Organization
The Archimedes Project
Project LOFT (Art Inspection)
Deconstructing Beck
Phone In Sick Day 2002
The Zapatista Floodnet
The Secret Writer's Society hack
Popotla vs. Titanic
The Barbie Liberation Organization
The SimCopter hack
The Threat of Millennium
Other past projects
Articles without project focus
Selected archive of recent press
A few ongoing projects

Learn more about SITC Project SITC: Sitcom clips versus news
      
Question Block 2 (The Human People)
Almost all people--from human people as normally understood, to multinational and other corporations--agree at this point that government serves to express the will of the human people. We at GWBush.com feel, however, that it should not only express the will of the human people, but carry it out. These questions are aimed at eliciting ideas about government and what it could accomplish, if it served and helped human people in various ways desired and requested by the majority. We are interested in the responses of human people, as well as official responses from corporations.
  1. Do you know that "We the people" refers not only to humans, but to corporations?
  2. How can government better serve human people?
  3. Should non-human people be given more rights--freedom, for example--than they already have?
  4. Should non-human people have some of their rights--the right to free speech, bear arms, etc.--taken away?
  5. If so, will taking away non-human people's rights create a bad situation for human people?
  6. A good one?

Home | New projects | Past projects | Material | World

¤ 2000 ®TMark, Inc. No terms of use.
http://www.rtmark.com